Patricia Cornwell Denies Ripper Obsession
Posted on August 27, 2005
Bestselling crime writer Patricia Cornwell decided to respond to the critics of her theories about Jack the Ripper, so she placed full page ads in British newspapers daring the critics to prove her theories wrong.
The successful US author has spent years and a considerable amount of money trying to establish the murderer's identity. In her 2002 book -- Portrait of a Killer, Jack the Ripper: Case Closed -- she purports to have "exposed" the 19th century killer as artist Walter Sickert.In the ads she also denies that she is "obsessed" with Jack the Ripper, as a newspaper recently alleged. Corwell said in the ads:
Her theories have been questioned by Ripper experts, including American Stephen Ryder, who describes her claims as "largely inaccurate." Authors of books on Sickert, such as Richard Shone and Matthew Sturgis, also reject her allegations. In full-page advertisements thought to cost more than $20,000 each in The Independent and The Guardian, Cornwell challenged her critics to prove her wrong.
"My ongoing investigation is far from an obsession, but an excellent opportunity to provide a platform for applying modern science to a very old, highly visible case in the hope that we might learn something that could help solve modern crimes," Cornwell wrote in the ads, published in The Independent and The Guardian.And to those who say that taking out $40,000 worth of ads to deny one is obsessed merely proves that one is obsessed, we say, shame on you!