Blog Homepage
Linking to Us
RSS Feed
WWFeeds.com
Resources
Internet Writing Journal®
ReadersRead.com
The Write NewsTM
Writer's Blog
Writer's Bookstore
Writer's Classifieds
Writers Write®
Writing Jobs
Add to Bloglines
Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo!
|
Posts with tag: peter-lance | Return to the Writer's Blog Homepage
Terrorism and Censorship: An Interview With Peter Lance: Part 2
 In Part 1 of our interview with five time Emmy Award-winning investigative journalist Peter Lance, Peter talked about how U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald tried to kill the new trade paperback version of his bestselling 9/11 expose,
Triple Cross: How Bin
Laden's Master Spy Penetrated the CIA, the Green Berets, and the FBI.
Now, in Part 2, Peter talks about his experience testifying in front of the 9/11 Commission, the evidence that was hidden from the public and why no one was held accountable in the aftermath of 9/11.
One of the strange things about the 9/11 aftermath is that no one really got blamed and no one got fired
as a result of the biggest terrorist act committed on American soil. Why is that, do you think?
The fact that the 9/11 Commission held no one accountable is the subject of my second book Cover Up. Half of the Commission staff was made up of alumni of the very agencies who were supposed to protect America. A key player in the whitewash that became the 9/11 Commission Report was Dietrich
Snell, the ex-Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York (who worked under Patrick Fitzgerald).
I demonstrated probative evidence in Triple Cross that Snell and his co-prosecutor in the 1996 Bojinka case, Mike Garcia, received the evidence from
the Philippines National Police (PNP) in 1995 detailing Ramzi Yousef's "planes as missiles" plot -- ultimately carried out by his uncle Khalid Shaikh
Mohammed (KSM) on 9/11.
Snell took my testimony before the Commission in a windowless conference room at 26 Federal Plaza, the building that houses the FBI's New York
Office.
As I detail in the piece I just wrote for Playboy "The Chilling Effect," Snell
then flushed all the evidence that I provided that the plot
originated with Yousef and KSM in Manila in 1994 and pushed the origin of the plot ahead 2 years to 1996 to a time after Yousef had been captured
(thus removing him from the plot).
Snell then reduced all of my testimony to a single end note and he cited as the sole authority on the 1996 date, KSM himself, who we now know
was waterboarded more than 183 times. As noted in Triple Cross, relying on the word of KSM for such an important date is like taking the word
for David Berkowitz for when he committed the first Son of Sam Murder. KSM's tortured testimony was completely unreliable.
In the Playboy piece I also cited a recent study by Robert Windrem, formerly of NBC News, who went back and discovered the shocking fact
that 25% of
the supporting end notes were derived from the testimony of "detainees" who were subject to enhanced interrogation techniques like waterboarding
and other coercive methods -- in short the testimony was wholly unreliable.
And this is the M.O. of the last official body to investigate the biggest unsolved mass murder in U.S. history.
To answer your question, no one got blamed because those charged with assessing blame (who failed to do so) would have had to blame themselves.
The 9/11 Commission was the ultimate example of the foxes guarding the chicken coop.
*****
You can follow Peter on Twitter at Twitter.com/triplecross. Triple Cross is an absolutely fascinating read and is available at Amazon.com.
Posted on July 12, 2009
Permalink| | | Comments (View) |
| |
Terrorism and Censorship: An Interview With Peter Lance: Part 1
Five time Emmy Award-winning investigative journalist Peter Lance got a real surprise when it came time to publish the trade
paperback version of his bestselling 9/11 expose, Triple Cross: How Bin
Laden's Master Spy Penetrated the CIA, the Green Berets, and the FBI, which tells the shocking story of Ali Mohamed, the Egyptian who
managed to penetrate the deepest levels of the U.S. intelligence community and provide crucial intelligence to Al Qaeda terrorist operations
for years before the 9/11 terrorist attacks, all while being paid by the U.S. government.
U.S. District Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald threatened to sue HarperCollins if it did not halt publication, pull every last copy of the book
from all bookstores in the United States and admit that the book was all lies. For nearly two years HarperCollins and Peter Lance
painstakingly rechecked every fact in the book. The book, with a new introduction and updated information, was just published
despite Fitzgerald's many threatening letters. Fitzgerald objects to the book on personal grounds, not in his capacity as a U.S. Attorney. Fitzgerald led the counterterrorism task force in the Southern District of New York that was responsible for finding and stopping
Osama bin Laden long before September 11, 2001, and that office's many mistakes are laid out in painstaking detail in the book. The Justice Department has made no attempt to censor the book, but Fitzgerald (who is used to adulation by the press) personally objected
to his portrayal in the book and began sending cease and desist letters. One of the letters was faxed from the Justice Department,
which Lance says was done to falsely give the impression that the Justice Department was threatening to sue HarperCollins. Lance filed a complaint with the Justice Department, asking to open an Office of Professional Responsibility investigation based on Fitzgerald's actions in trying to kill the book. Lance says that Fitzgerald improperly used government resources to intimidate and harass him and his publisher.
Lance, who worked for ABC for many years, was shocked that a top official at the Justice Department was trying to censor a book
that was so meticulously researched. Lance himself testified at the 9/11 Commission hearings and is known for his meticulous attention to detail.
Peter talked to us about Fitzgerald's lawsuit threats and how he felt about the attempt to censor his work:
Has Patrick Fitzgerald followed through on this threat to sue? Has he responded to the ethics complaint you filed?
As of this date Fitzgerald, who promised in his letter of June 2nd that if the book was published and "if in fact... it defames
me or casts me in a false light, Harper Collins will be sued," hasn't even come close.
The fact is that Fitzgerald, who knows the libel standard as set forth in the landmark case of New York Times vs. Sullivan,
knew back in October, 2007 when he sent the first of four threat letters to HarperCollins that he didn't have a viable libel
claim. To mount one he'd have to prove not also falsity but that I acted with "reckless disregard for the truth" or "actual malice;"
a threshold he could never meet since the book of 604 pages was meticulously researched with 1,420+ end notes and 32 pages of documentary
appendices.
Yet in his latest letter of June 2nd trying to stop publication of the trade paperback Fitzgerald wrote that the entire book was
"a deliberate lie masquerading as the truth."
What an incredibly reckless statement from a Federal prosecutor who should choose his words carefully.
As a journalist, how you do you feel about a top government official trying to censor your book?
I frankly think that it's repugnant, for any government official to try and kill any book -- much less the man who is arguably
the most intimidating Federal prosecutor in America seeking to use the private libel laws to pulp a book critical of his performance in office.
*****
You can read Fitzgerald's threatening letters here (pdf file). You can read Peter Lance's ethics complaint against Fitzgerald
here (pdf file). Triple Cross is available at bookstores everywhere and for a nice discount at Amazon.com.
You can read Part II of our interview with Pater Lance here.
Posted on July 10, 2009
Permalink| | | Comments (View) |
| |
|
The Writers Write
Lifestyle Network
Bloggers Blog
Crafters Craft
Drivers Drive
Fantasy SF Blog
Gamers Game
Health News Blog
HowToWeb.com
The IWJ Blog
Lovers Love
Media Cynic
Petsosphere
Pleasant Morning Buzz
Readers Read
Science News Blog
Shopping Blog
Singers Sing
Sportsosphere
Surfers Surf
Traders Trade
Video Nacho
Watchers Watch
Workers Work
The Write News
Writer's Blog
|
