Blog Homepage
Linking to Us
RSS Feed
WWFeeds.com
Resources
Internet Writing Journal®
ReadersRead.com
The Write NewsTM
Writer's Blog
Writer's Bookstore
Writer's Classifieds
Writers Write®
Writing Jobs

Add to Bloglines
Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo!
|
Posts with tag: journalism | Return to the Writer's Blog Homepage
PEN/ESPN Award for Literary Sports Writing Created
ESPN and the PEN American Center have announced the formation of the PEN/ESPN Award for Literary Sports Writing. The inaugural $5,000 PEN/ESPN Award for Literary Sports Writing will honor a nonfiction book about sports. Eligible titles should be of a biographical, investigative, historical, or analytical nature and of the strongest literary character. The award will be open to all such books published in the United States in 2009. Publishers, authors, and agents must submit eligible titles by June 15, 2010.
You can find out more details here on PEN's website.
Posted on May 13, 2010
Permalink| | | Comments (View) |
| |
Happy Punctuation Day!
Today is Punctuation Day, so let's celebrate! Unfortunately, we have no idea how exactly we are supposed to celebrate punctuation. Perhaps a review of some punctuation rules would be in order:
SEMICOLON
The punctuation mark used to indicate a major division in a sentence where a more distinct separation is felt between clauses or items on a list than is indicated by a comma, as between two clauses of a compound sentence.
Use the semicolon to link independent clauses not joined by a coordinating conjunction. Semicolons should join only those independent clauses that are closely related in meaning.
Abdominal exercises help prevent back pain; proper posture is also important.
The auditors made six recommendations; however, only one has been adopted so far.
We feel better already. Now who's up for a rousing debate about the proper use of the ellipsis?
Posted on September 24, 2009
Permalink| | | Comments (View) |
| |
Wealthy Reading More Than Ever
There has been a lot of doom and gloom in the newspaper and magazine business because of falling readership. But a new Ipsos study shows that the wealthy are reading print publications slightly more than they did just five years ago. more than ever.
Respondents making more than $100,000 annually said their average hours online had grown to 22.1 each week from 10.7, while the time they said they spent watching TV sunk to 18.6 hours from 23.7 in the 2003 survey. And they said their time spent listening to the radio had declined slightly. But they said they're regularly reading an average of 15.3 print publications, a notch above 15.1 five years earlier. Readers making more than $250,000 said they read just as many publications, 23.8 now, as they did in 2003.
"The conventional wisdom for print is 'Woe is me,'" said Bob Shullman, president of Ipsos Mendelsohn. "But if you look at this, at least among the affluent population, readership of issues per capita, it's staying constant."
The magazine business has its worries, to be sure: High gas prices are reducing drives to the supermarket while the broader economic slump makes readers think twice before buying new magazines. Newsstand sales, as a result, are looking grim this year. Ad-page sales are equally dour, down 7.42% across the monthlies through September, according to the Media Industry Newsletter. Newspapers, for their part, are fighting far darker demons.
But these problems don't affect the affluent market the same way as they do everyone else, said Ted D'Amico, senior VP-research, Ipsos Mendelsohn. "Readership has held its own among the affluent segment," Mr. D'Amico said. "Why is this the case? There are two factors. One, education. And they can afford magazines."
Those with more disposable income -- and education -- have more hours in the day to read newspapers, magazines and books. And businesspeople read a large number of periodicals. That's good news for journalists and freelancers and a small bright spot for struggling magazines and newspapers.
Posted on September 4, 2008
Permalink| | | Comments (View) |
| |
Tribune Announces $4.5 Billion Second Quarter Loss
Tribune Newspapers has reported
a mind-boggling second quarter loss of $4.5 billion.
How bad is the business outlook for Tribune Co.'s newspapers? Bad enough for the company to take a $3.8 billion goodwill write-down on the value of its newspaper assets, which include the Los Angeles Times, Chicago Tribune, Baltimore Sun and Orlando Sentinel.
In all, Tribune is reporting a $4.5 billion loss in its second-quarter, according to figures released Wednesday. The red ink was fueled by the newspaper write-down, costs associated with its sale of the Long Island-based newspaper Newsday to Cablevision, and an 11% decline in revenues in its publishing division, or an $83 million drop from the same period last year to $701 million.
*****
Tribune's TV stations fared better than the newspapers, but the overall market woes were a drag on stations as well. Revenue at its 23 stations was up 2% from the same period in 2007 to $292 million. However, TV operating expenses climbed 7%, which cut into the stations' operating cash flow. In that important measure, operating cash flow dropped 8% to $92 million.
The newspaper business is in a downward spiral. Bankruptcy rumors have been swirling around Tribune, and with the release of these numbers today, it's easy to see why.
Posted on August 13, 2008
Permalink| | | Comments (View) |
| |
More Layoffs at The New York Times
The New York Times is facing
major cuts in staff, according to the New York Post.
The New York Times' news room is bracing for a bloodbath in the next 10 days.
The word from inside is that approximately 50 unionized journalists have accepted the buyout proposal, and only another 20 non-union editorial employees have gotten on board.
That means the ax could fall on as many as 30 editorial people in the company's first-ever mass firing of journalists in its 156-year history.
Executive Editor William Keller had said originally that he was looking to cut 100 people from the Times staff in response to the dismal newspaper advertising environment.
But then a week ago Assistant Managing Editor William Schmidt issued a memo saying it was almost certain that the company would be forced to make involuntary cuts, and he urged more volunteers to come forward.
The plea apparently fell on deaf ears.
With just 70 people stepping forward for buyouts, it is very likely that 30 newsroom staffers will be forced out in coming days.
"We're bracing for it," said one insider with some knowledge of the developments. "There's a lot of anxiety."
With competitive threats looming from The Wall Street Journal, which like The Post is owned by News Corp., sources said the business desk and national desk will be spared and will absorb only token cuts.
The Time hasn't confirmed the cuts, but the rumors are running rampant.
Posted on April 25, 2008
Permalink| | | Comments (View) |
| |
Are Print Movie Critics an Endangered Species?
Movie critics are about to become an endangered species, according to The New York Times.
The week before, two longtime critics at Newsday - Jan Stuart and Gene Seymour - took buyouts, along with their editor. And at Newsweek, David Ansen is among 111 staff members taking buyouts, according to a report in Radar.
They join critics at more than a dozen daily newspapers (including those in Denver, Tampa and Fort Lauderdale) and several alternative weeklies who have been laid off, reassigned or bought out in the past few years, deemed expendable at a time when revenues at print publications are declining, under pressure from Web alternatives and a growing recession in media spending.
Given that movie blogs are strewn about the Web like popcorn on a theater floor, there are those who say that movie criticism is not going away, it's just appearing on a different platform. And no one would argue that fewer critics and the adjectives they hurl would imperil the opening of Iron Man in May. But for a certain kind of movie, critical accolades can mean the difference between relevance and obscurity, not to mention box office success or failure.
"For those of us who are making work that requires a kind of intellectual conversation, we rely on that talk to do the work of getting people interested," said Mr. Rudin, who produced No Country for Old Men and There Will Be Blood, two Oscar-nominated and critically championed films last year. "All of the talk about No Country, all of the argument about the ending, kept that film in the forefront of the conversation" and helped it win the best picture Oscar.
We believe that film criticism is a thriving art, but that the format is merely changing. Look at the popularity of RottenTomatoes: people love to read about a film before they see it and after they've seen it they like to see what everyone else thought. At least we do. But then again, we're obsessive readers, writers, critics, filmgoers and bloggers around here.
Posted on April 9, 2008
Permalink| | | Comments (View) |
| |
Reed Elsevier to Sell Variety and Publisher's Weekly
Publisher's Lunch reports that Reed Elsevier intends to sell off their business information unit, which includes Variety and Publisher's Weekly.
CEO Crispin Davis says "its advertising revenue model and the inherent cyclicality fit less well with the subscription-based information and workflow solutions focus of Reed Elsevier's strategy." He also said "broadly, print publishing is flat while online is growing at around 11 percent a year." Reed Exhibitions--currently a division of the RBI, which operates BEA and the London Book Fair--will be retained by the company.
While the company timed their sale of Harcourt assets perfectly last year, the RBI sale faces a far different marketplace. Davis acknowledged in a conference call that the sale may take some time, saying "Our approach is that we're not going to be rushed into it." He told analysts, "We don't have any particular buyer in mind, we do think there will be a wide and strong level of interest in this business both from strategic and private equity buyers, we are very open minded on who and when." Reuters says that Numis Securities estimates the division could sell for $2 billion.
Because there is no buyer lined up, it's a bit hard on the staff who don't have a clue what's going to happen next.
Posted on February 21, 2008
Permalink| | | Comments (View) |
| |
New York Times Eliminating 100 Newsroom Jobs
The New York Times is
cutting
100 newsroom jobs.
After years of resisting the newsroom cuts that have hit most of the industry, The New York Times will bow to growing financial strain and eliminate about 100 newsroom jobs this year, the executive editor said Thursday.
The cuts will be achieved by "by not filling jobs that go vacant, by offering buyouts, and if necessary by layoffs," said the executive editor, Bill Keller. The more people who accept buyouts, he said, "the smaller the prospect of layoffs, but we should brace ourselves for the likelihood that there will be some layoffs."
The Times has 1,332 newsroom employees, the largest number in its history; no other American newspaper has more than about 900. There were scattered buyouts and job eliminations in The Times' newsroom in recent years, but the overall number continued to rise, largely because of the growth of its Internet operations.
Shares in The New York Times Company rose almost 5 percent Thursday after the newsroom staff reductions were reported, closing at $18.84, up 86 cents.
The Times Company has made significant cuts in the newsrooms of some of its other properties, including The Boston Globe, as well as in non-news operations. Company executives say the overall head count is 3.8 percent lower than it was a year ago.
But with the industry's economic picture worsening, the company is under increased pressure from shareholders -- notably two hedge funds that recently bought almost 10 percent of the common stock -- to do something dramatic to improve its bottom line.
For 2007, it recently reported earnings of $209 million on revenue of $3.2 billion.
Newspaper industry ad revenue fell about 7 percent last year, and 4.7 percent at The Times Company, and executives around the industry have projected that 2008 will be equally bad.
Other large newspapers have made much bigger cuts, proportionally, than those The Times is planning; some newsrooms are more than 20 percent smaller than they were early in this decade.
Even so, eliminating jobs has grown harder "because the low-hanging fruit is gone, and so is some of the higher-hanging fruit," Mr. Keller said. And he suggested that the cuts could not help but affect the newspaper's journalism.
"To meet our budget goals, we will have to do a little less, and every time we do less, we cede a bit of advantage," he said. "Our challenge will be to set our priorities in such a way that we do less in the areas that damage our competitiveness least."
This is just more evidence of the growing malaise in the newspaper industry. Investigative, original reporting is already in short supply. Firing journalists only worsens the problem.
Posted on February 15, 2008
Permalink| | | Comments (View) |
| |
Banned From Louis Vuitton: The Price of Journalism
Journalist Dana Thomas' new book has reportedly gotten her banned
from all future Louis Vuitton fashion shows. Her book, Deluxe: How Luxury Lost Its Luster has infuriated the top brass at LVMH Moët Hennessey with its unflattering portrayal of Louis Vuitton's practices, methods and promotion of handbags that are ridiculously priced. The theme of the book is that the massification of luxury goods has cheapened the concept of luxury altogether.
The ripe rumor going through the rafters at the Louis Vuitton show Sunday night was that company chief Yves Carcelle had called journalist Dana Thomas personally to inform her that she would never be invited to another Vuitton show or event as long as he was still in charge. It was apparent that Carcelle was miffed by the veteran fashion industry reporter's new book, Deluxe: How Luxury Lost Its Luster, and in particular by how she called LVMH Moët Hennessey's crown jewel brand "the McDonald's of the luxury industry: it's far and away the leader, brags of millions sold, has stores at all the top tourist sites--usually steps away from a McD's--and has a logo as recognizable as the Golden Arches." During the brief phone conversation, Thomas was said to have replied, in a cordial yet terse manner, "Thank you very much."
Post show, Carcelle confirmed to Fashion Week Daily that he had spoken to Thomas and decided it would not be appropriate for her to attend Sunday's show, but echoed a clearer thought. "We think she [Dana] wrote some things that were just not true; for example, how Vuitton marks up products 13 times what it costs us to produce," he explained. "I called her to express my unhappiness with the book. But if she would like to come to the show next season, she is welcome to." His wife, Rebecca, added, "You don't have the reputation Yves has by speaking to people in a derogatory manner." Wanting to move on from the subject, Carcelle concluded, "She complained to The Washington Post and The New York Post; if we're the McDonald's of luxury, then she is the McDonald's of press!"
Oh, snap! Now before you snippily ask, "what's it to me that Dana may be permanently banned from the good seats at the Louis Vuitton fashion shows?", consider this: Dana Thomas has been the cultural and fashion writer for Newsweek in Paris for twelve years. To ban her from a major fashion show is like banning Nick Roberts from ever going to Iraq or Aftghanistan.
Posted on October 10, 2007
Permalink| | | Comments (View) |
| |
George Clooney to Edit The Independent
The newsroom at The Independent (U.K.) is about to a lot more interesting: actor, director, screenwriter and activist George Clooney will do a guest-editing
stint for the newspaper.
Negotiations are under way for Clooney to follow in the footsteps of rock star Bono and fashion designer Giorgio Armani and guest edit an edition of the paper for the Africa charity Product Red.
If talks bear fruit, Clooney, whose high profile campaigning against the genocide in Darfur chimes with the Independent's own editorial stance, would edit the paper for a day next year, possibly in March.
Clooney and his journalist father, Nick, have lobbied the UN about the violence in the region and travelled to Sudan in a bid to stop the killings.
The actor, who won his best supporting actor Academy Award for Syriana, has described his Darfur campaign as an attempt to "use the credit card that you get for being famous in the right instances whenever you can".
Over the past year the Independent and Independent on Sunday have run 294 articles about Darfur, including a front-page article in August by actress Mia Farrow about how she had witnessed suffering in the region at first hand.
The paper also ran an interview with Clooney about Darfur when Armani "guest designed" the paper in September last year.
The actor's Hollywood press agent denied that the paper had been in talks with Clooney. However, MediaGuardian.co.uk understands that PR agency Freud Communications, which handles the Product Red campaign, is negotiating on behalf of the paper.
The Independent was unavailable for comment and a spokesman at Freud said that the agency was not currently planning anything with the Independent.
The paper secured Bono as its guest editor in May last year in a blaze of publicity. At the time the Independent said the Bono edition sold about 70,000 extra copies; one industry source said the increase was closer to 50,000 copies.
We'd grump about celebrities thinking they can be children's authors and journalists without any prior training, but we're going to give Clooney a pass. He's smart, articulate and is a good writer. The fact that he was People's Sexiest Man Alive and is unbelievably handsome doesn't enter into it at all.
Posted on October 1, 2007
Permalink| | | Comments (View) |
| |
Pulitzer Finalists' Names Leaked
Editor and Publisher reports that the list of Pulitzer Prize finalists has been leaked once again.
It didn't take long for the Pulitzer Prize finalist lists to begin leaking out. Within hours of the 14 Pulitzer juries packing up to go home on Wednesday after three days of judging at Columbia University, the names of this year's alleged finalists began to spread.
So far, E&P has compiled a likely list of nine of the 14 journalism finalist groups. These are compiled from multiple sources -- based on chats with some judges and editors at some newspapers that received firm word -- with at least two confirming their accuracy. E&P has been publishing these leaked lists for five years and they have proven to be very accurate in the past. However, as we always note: This is NOT official and mistakes can happen.
The Commentary award nominee list is:
1. Joe Nocera - The New York Times
2. Cynthia Tucker - Atlanta Journal Constitution
3. Ruth Marcus - The Washington Post
You can see the full list of unofficial finalists here.
Posted on March 8, 2007
Permalink| | | Comments (View) |
| |
Warren Adler Predicts the End of Mass Media: Niche Content is In
Bestselling novelist Warren Adler is predicting the end of mass media as we know it. In his new newsletter, Warren discusses the growing disconnect between newspapers' editorial content and their advertising. This has led to the rise of niche media and super-targeted advertising. Anyone who has sat through fifteen minutes of commercials at a movie theater has experienced this phenomenon.
The niche is in, the mass media is out.
The people The [New York] Times champions, by and large, do not read the newspaper and, for the most part cannot afford the goods and entertainment products it hawks to its audience. I keep wondering how many of the folks they root for can afford a $10 thousand bracelet from Bulgari or a hundred dollar ticket to a Broadway show, zealously and repeatedly advertised within its pages. Indeed, how many of the people who would be the recipients of the largesse it supports for the underclass can even afford a subscription to the paper.
This disconnect seems to afflict the news magazine business as well, which is another dinosaur headed for extinction along with other general interest magazines. Content aside, the proliferation of television channels, and the overwhelming competition from other amusements like computer games and other exploding advances in technology will eventually force one’s attention to niche areas of interest, making it impossible to reach a wide audience with a one size fits all message.
Advertisers are busy looking for other spots to hawk their messages. We wear their logos on our clothes without charge. Buildings, stadiums, parks and other visible public edifices are now being named after businesses and products. Expect more and more venues to sport business’ logos and product names. Not an inch of public space will be safe from advertisers, including airplanes and all forms of public transportation.
Movie theaters are forcing their customers to watch endless commercials. Cell phones will soon explode with text, moving pictures and jingles hawking products. News sites will give you a TV report live or canned but first you will have to watch a commercial. Expect ads to appear on prescription drug labels, on doctor’s prescription forms, on alarm clocks, and proliferate on old standbys like food packages, book pages, school supplies.
Warren says soon we'll see ads on walls, sidewalks and on projections in the air. Coke and Pepsi will pay people to get tattoos with their logos. This is not a happy thing, in our opinion. We love the concept of ad-supported free content (that's the model we use on WritersWrite.com), because is gives people free content. But when it comes to ads being projected all around us in real life, that's something else entirely. And as for having to sit through commercials at the movie theater, after we've already paid for a ticket, well, that really gets us steamed.
Posted on March 7, 2007
Permalink| | | Comments (View) |
| |
Daily Variety Picks Up Rival's Top Writers
Daily Variety announced that it hired Cynthia Littleton, editor of Variety's arch-rival, The Hollywood Reorter.
Cynthia Littleton, who was promoted to editor at the Reporter last March, will become deputy editor for news development, Daily Variety reported on its Web site. She previously worked at Daily Variety as a TV writer.
Deputy film editor Anne Thompson, who joined the Reporter two years ago, becomes deputy editor at Variety.com. They will write and edit for both the print and online versions of Daily Variety, the paper said.
In a memo to colleagues, Thompson said "the opportunity to expand and grow on the online side is irresistible." Littleton declined comment. A spokeswoman for the Reporter's immediate parent, VNU Business Media, did not return a call.
Both Littleton and Thompson were still working in the Reporter's newsroom on Monday night.
The move comes in the wake of layoffs at The Hollywood Reporter in December, so things in the newsroom must be seeming a bit grim these days.
Posted on March 6, 2007
Permalink| | | Comments (View) |
| |
The Joy of Interjections
Ben Yagoda of Slate examines how the Internet has amplified the use of interjections and made them universal. Of particular interest to the columnist are the various uses of "aaha," "meh" and "feh."
It's not that e-mail, blogs, IM-ing, message boards, and texting have spawned a litter of brand-new interjections. (I don't count emoticons because you can't utter them, and I don't count acronyms like LOL and CU because they represent phrases with grammatical standing.) Rather, they have given lots of marginal ones, like awwa, a spelled-out form and thus a major shot in the arm. A personal favorite is meh, which (of course) has no definition in the OED but 737 separate ones on urbandictionary.com, including: "A random word when people either don't know what to say, don't care, can't answer a question or are too drunk to form a coherent english phrase." Meh—which can also be used as an adjective, e.g., "I felt kind of meh about the whole thing"—had the ultimate honor of being featured in a Simpsons exchange.
*****
Feh, a venerable Yiddish term indicating disgust or dismissal, has ridden to popularity on meh's coattails. "Flameviper," an urbandictionary.com contributor, explains some of feh's fine points: "When it is the answer to a question, it usually means 'no.' It is also used to calmly dismiss insults without resorting to a direct comeback (which could lead to a confrontation). Also used to dismiss orders. Sometimes (rarely) used in frustration."
*****
Interjections are suitable for online writing, as I say, because of the way online writing mimics speech. But newspaper and magazine writers who spell out interjections and other vocalisms run the risk of coming off as cute—as in yucky ew rather than adorable awwa. Most egregiously abused are what linguists call "discourse markers"—short sounds (it seems a stretch to call them "words") that speakers use to register hesitation, agreement, encouragement, ambivalence, and other responses. Uh, er, and um, in particular, have been flagrantly overused by feature writers and columnists to signal an impending attempt at irony or humor; the maneuver is now well beyond cliché, somewhere in the neighborhood of desperation.
That's easy for him to say. Sometimes you just need a good discourse marker to indicate your feelings of hesitation and, um, ambivalence about a certain subject. Heh.
Posted on February 16, 2007
Permalink| | | Comments (View) |
| |
Sulzberger Predicts the End of Print Newpapers
Arthur Sulzberger, owner, chairman and publisher of The New York TImes shocked just about everyone at the World Economic Summit in Davos, Switzerland when he said that he doesn't know if The Times will even be in print in five years. As media moves to the Internet, he's not sure print will even stick around.
Given the constant erosion of the printed press, do you see the New York Times still being printed in five years?
"I really don't know whether we'll be printing the Times in five years, and you know what? I don't care either," he says.
Sulzberger is focusing on how to best manage the transition from print to Internet.
"The Internet is a wonderful place to be, and we're leading there," he points out.
The Times, in fact, has doubled its online readership to 1.5 million a day to go along with its 1.1 million subscribers for the print edition.
Sulzberger says the New York Times is on a journey that will conclude the day the company decides to stop printing the paper. That will mark the end of the transition. It's a long journey, and there will be bumps on the road, says the man at the driving wheel, but he doesn't see a black void ahead.
Asked if local papers have a future, Sulzberger points out that the New York Times is not a local paper, but rather a national one based in New York that enjoys more readers from outside, than within, the city.
Classifieds have long been a major source of income to the press, but the business is moving to the Internet.
Sulzberger agrees, but what papers lose, Web sites gain. Media groups can develop their online advertising business, he explains. Also, because Internet advertising doesn't involve paper, ink and distribution, companies can earn the same amount of money even if it receives less advertising revenue.
Really? What about the costs of development and computerization?
"These costs aren't anywhere near what print costs," Sulzberger says. "The last time we made a major investment in print, it cost no less than $1 billion. Site development costs don't grow to that magnitude."
That's a pretty shocking statement coming from someone like Sulzberger. But it's in line with what other industry insiders are saying. Print newspapers will no longer exist one day -- which will save a lot of trees. Although it depresses people who love to read a morning paper with a cup of coffee.
Posted on February 7, 2007
Permalink| | | Comments (View) |
| |
|
The Writers Write Lifestyle Network
Bloggers Blog
Crafters Craft
Drivers Drive
Fantasy SF Blog
Gamers Game
Health News Blog
HowToWeb.com
The IWJ Blog
Lovers Love
Media Cynic
Petsosphere
Pleasant Morning Buzz
Readers Read
Science News Blog
Shopping Blog
Singers Sing
Sportsosphere
Surfers Surf
Traders Trade
Video Nacho
Watchers Watch
Workers Work
The Write News
Writer's Blog
|